From Climate Finance to Humanitarian Reality: Assessing Loss and Damage in Bangladesh

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56744/irchum.v5i1.134

Keywords:

Loss and Damage, Humanitarian Governance, Climate Vulnerability, Climate Finance, Bangladesh

Abstract

Climate change has increasingly intensified humanitarian vulnerabilities in climate-prone countries such as Bangladesh. Coastal communities regularly experience cyclones, flooding, salinity intrusion, and river erosion, resulting in displacement, food insecurity, livelihood loss, and growing human insecurity. Against this backdrop, Loss and Damage has emerged as a significant issue within global climate governance, particularly following the establishment of the Warsaw International Mechanism and the COP27 Loss and Damage Fund. This study examines how effectively Loss and Damage finance addresses humanitarian vulnerabilities in climate-affected communities in Bangladesh. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research analyzes secondary data collected from UNFCCC documents, IPCC reports, humanitarian assessments, government policies, NGO reports, and peer-reviewed literature. The findings indicate that although global recognition of Loss and Damage has increased, existing financing mechanisms remain insufficient, centralized, and constrained by bureaucratic and political barriers. The study also finds that donor dominance, institutional fragmentation, and limited localization weaken humanitarian effectiveness at the community level. While Bangladesh has strengthened disaster preparedness and adaptation governance, vulnerable communities continue to face unequal access to climate finance and limited participation in decision-making processes. The study argues for a more localized, justice-centered, and humanitarian-oriented climate finance system to address the growing realities of climate-induced loss and damage in the Global South.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006

Afinowi, O., & Nhamo, G. (2025). A systematic review of guiding legal and policy framework on climate-induced loss and damage. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01363-x

Ahmed, B., Kelman, I., Fehr, H. K., & Saha, M. (2016). Community resilience to cyclone disasters in coastal Bangladesh. Sustainability, 8(8), 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080805

Barbelet, V. (2018). As local as possible, as international as necessary: Understanding capacity and complementarity in humanitarian action. ODI Humanitarian Policy Group

Barnett, M. (2013). Humanitarian governance. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-012512-083711

Calliari, E., Serdeczny, O., & Vanhala, L. (2020). Making sense of the politics in the climate change loss & damage debate. Global Environmental Change, 64, 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102133

Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T., & Khan, M. R. (2018). Power in a warming world: The new global politics of climate change and the remaking of environmental inequality. MIT Press

Chakroborty, S., & Rakib, M. A. (2026). Quantifying climate-induced non-economic loss and damage in coastal Bangladesh to inform policy. Evolving Earth, 4, 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eve.2026.100138

Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. (2023). National adaptation plan of Bangladesh (2023–2050). Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.

Haque, U., Hashizume, M., Kolivras, K. N., Overgaard, H. J., Das, B., & Yamamoto, T. (2012). Reduced death rates from cyclones in Bangladesh: What more needs to be done? Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90(2), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.11.088302

Hossain, A., Ahmed, B., Rahman, T., Sammonds, P., Zaman, S., Benzadid, S., & Jakariya, M. (2021). Household food insecurity, income loss, and symptoms of psychological distress among adults following the Cyclone Amphan in coastal Bangladesh. PLOS ONE, 16(11), e0259098. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259098

Huq, S., & Ayers, J. (2007). Critical list: The 100 nations most vulnerable to climate change. IIED

Huq, S., Roberts, E. & Fenton, A. (2013). Loss and damage. Nature Clim Change 3, 947–949. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2026

Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. (2023). Global report on internal displacement 2023. IDMC Report

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. IPCC Reports

Islam, M. M., & Winkel, J. (2017). Climate change and social inequality in Bangladesh. Journal of Social Research & Policy, 8(1), 5–18.

Jackson, G., Schalatek, L., & Singh, C. (2022). Loss and damage finance: Current gaps and future directions. Heinrich Böll Stiftung

Khan, M. R., Roberts, J. T., & Ciplet, D. (2023). Climate justice and loss and damage governance in vulnerable countries. Climate Policy, 23(4), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2143635

Mallick, A., & Mallick, B. (2021). Staying despite riverbank erosion: Evidence of coastal Bangladesh. SN Social Sciences, 1, Article 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00104-x

Masud-All-Kamal, M., & Nursey-Bray, M. (2021). Socially just community-based climate change adaptation? Insights from Bangladesh. Local Environment, 26(9), 1092–1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1962829

Mechler, R., & Schinko, T. (2016). Identifying the policy space for climate loss and damage. Science, 354(6310), 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0644

Mechler, R., Singh, C., Ebi, K., Djalante, R., Thomas, A., James, R., Tschakert, P., Wewerinke-Singh, M., Schinko, T., Ley, D., Nalau, J., Bouwer, L. M., Huggel, C., Huq, S., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Surminski, S., Pinho, P., Jones, R., Boyd, E., & Revi, A. (2020). Loss and damage and limits to adaptation: Recent IPCC insights and implications for climate science and policy. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00807-9

Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief. (2020). National plan for disaster management (2021–2025). Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh.

Newell, P., Srivastava, S., Naess, L. O., Torres Contreras, G. A., & Price, R. (2021). Toward transformative climate justice: An emerging research agenda. WIREs Climate Change, 12(6), e733. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.733

Nipa, F., Lino, A. F., & Arun, T. (2025). Third-sector organizations as intermediaries in climate action: Engaging vulnerable communities in co-production in Bangladesh. Governance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.70058

Ojha, H., Rafa, N., Bhattarai, B., Banjade, P., Bartlett, C., Aryal, K., Shrestha, K., Gurung, P., Naushin, N., Zaman, T., Adhikari, B., Sujakhu, N., & Singh, P. M. (2026). Loss and damage financing for climate justice and transformation: Local insights from the climate frontline. Climatic Change, 179(3), Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-026-04146-z

Okereke, C., & Coventry, P. (2016). Climate justice and the international regime. WIREs Climate Change, 7(6), 834–851. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.419

Ribot, J. (2014). Cause and response: Vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5), 667–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.894911

Roberts, E., & Pelling, M. (2018). Climate change-related loss and damage: Translating the global policy agenda for national policy processes. Climate and Development, 10(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2016.1184608

Samui, S., Mallick, B., & Bailey, A. (2024). Impact of shifting from rice to shrimp farming on migration aspirations in Bangladesh. Regional Environmental Change, 24(4), Article 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-024-02312-6

Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. B. (2014). From environmental to climate justice: Climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. WIREs Climate Change, 5(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.275

Thomas, K., & Benjamin, L. (2018). Policies and mechanisms to address climate-induced migration and displacement in Pacific and South Asian countries. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 10(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-03-2017-0052

UN Women. (2022). Gender, climate and disaster vulnerability in Bangladesh. UN Women Asia-Pacific

United Nations Bangladesh. (2021). HCTT nexus strategy (2021–2025): Humanitarian-development collaboration for climate-related disasters in Bangladesh.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2013). Warsaw international mechanism for loss and damage associated with climate change impacts. UNFCCC Decisions Archive

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2019). Santiago network for averting, minimizing and addressing loss and damage. UNFCCC Santiago Network

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2023). Operationalization of the new funding arrangements, including a fund, for responding to loss and damage referred to in paragraphs 2–3 of Decisions 2/CP.27 and 2/CMA.4 (Decision 1/CP.28).

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2020). Bangladesh: Cyclone Amphan situation report. UNOCHA ReliefWeb Reports

Wisner, B., Gaillard, J. C., & Kelman, I. (2012). Handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge Disaster Studies

Downloads

Published

21-09-2026

How to Cite

Mahin, T. (2026). From Climate Finance to Humanitarian Reality: Assessing Loss and Damage in Bangladesh. Indonesian Red Crescent Humanitarian Journal, 5(1), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.56744/irchum.v5i1.134