The United Nations and the Paralysis of International Justice: Critical Overview of the UN's Role in the Gaza Conflict
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56744/irchum.v4i2s1.119Keywords:
Gaza Conflict, Humanity, United NationsAbstract
The Israel-Palestine conflict has endured for decades without a definitive resolution, resulting in catastrophic humanitarian consequences. The United Nations (UN), as the mandated guardian of peace, has undertaken numerous efforts, such as establishing the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), executing its mandates through Security Council resolutions, and proceedings before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). However, the persistence of Israel’s violence demonstrates the UN’s failure in enforcing peaceful measures and accountability for violations in Gaza. This has raised a new perspective concerning the UN’s institutional credibility and its ability to uphold the principles under the UN Charter. This paper aims to analyze the effectiveness of the UN’s role in addressing the Gaza conflict and to evaluate its actions in carrying out its resolution. Thus, the paper conducts a juridical-normative method, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to examine the actions between both parties, the application of general principles of law, and how structural power dynamics undermine the UN’s ability to enforce and uphold justice in the Gaza conflict. The findings show that the UN’s role remains far from optimal in resolving the Gaza conflict, primarily due to the restrictive mechanisms within the organization itself that paralyze effective action. These structural and procedural limitations, such as bureaucratic constraints on its subsidiary bodies, have hindered the UN’s responsiveness towards the crisis. Consequently, the very mechanisms intended to safeguard international peace and protect human rights have instead constrained the UN’s ability to intervene effectively and alleviate the ongoing humanitarian suffering in Gaza. Therefore, this institutional amendment is essential to strengthen the UN’s decisiveness, uphold humanitarian principles, and effectively maintain peace in resolving the Gaza conflict.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A. H., & Ali, H. S. (2025). The implications of UNSC resolutions in shaping the dynamics of the Palestinian–Israel peace process: The Israel–Hamas war as a case study. Journal of International and Strategic Studies, 6(1), 1–24.
Al Jazeera. (2024, April 23). By the numbers: 200 days of Israel’s war on Gaza. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/4/23/by-the-numbers-200-days-of-israels-war-on-gaza
Bartholomeusz, L. (2009). The mandate of UNRWA at sixty. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 28(2–3), 452–474.
Berman, L. (2023, January 2). Israel has claimed some wins in UN vote — but the ICJ process is a serious threat. The Times of Israel. https://www.timesofisrael.com
Bisharat, G. E. (2009). Israel’s invasion of Gaza in international law. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 38, 41–68.
Bocco, R. (2010). UNRWA and the Palestinian refugees: A history within history. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 28(2–3), 229–252.
Brown, I. (2008). Principles of public international law (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Brown, N. J. (2010). The Hamas–Fatah conflict: Shallow but wide. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 34(2), 35–49.
Centre for European Studies (CVCE), [The Cold War (1945–1989)], CVCE Publication (2011), available at https://www.cvce.eu
Charara, L. (2018). The legal architecture of United Nations peacekeeping: A case study of UNIFIL. Michigan Journal of International Law, 40, 385–432.
Charney, J. I. (1987). Compromissory clauses and the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. American Journal of International Law, 81(4), 855–887. https://doi.org/10.2307/2203414
Conforti, B., & Focarelli, C. (2016). The law and practice of the United Nations. Brill.
Dale, W. (1974). UNRWA – A subsidiary organ of the UN. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 23, 582–583.
Dewanto, W. A. (2005). Mahkamah internasional. CV Citramedia.
Diastiti, H., & Mulyani, L. W. (2025). Reformasi hak veto atas indikasi abuse of power dalam upaya perdamaian dunia. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra, 11(2), 101–118.
Erkiner, H. H. (2024, March 22). The legal foundations of South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice. The Platform.
Emanuela-Chiara Gillard, Enhancing the Security of Civilians in Conflict, Chatham House (2024), https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/04/enhancing-security-civiliansconflict/07-no-fly-zones (accessed 24 Oct. 2024).
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2019). The changing faces of UNRWA: From the global to the local. Journal of Humanitarian Affairs, 1(1), 28–41.
Gaeta, P. (Ed.). (2009). The UN genocide convention: A commentary. Oxford University Press.
Gea, G. V. V. (2024). Statement in Forum 15 Bincang Hukum UBAYA. Faculty of Law, Universitas Surabaya.
Gavrielov, N. (2023, December 27). Hamas and other militant groups are firing rockets into Israel every day. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com
Gillard, E.-C. (2024). Enhancing the security of civilians in conflict. Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org
Goldstone, R. J., & Fritz, N. (2000). “In the interests of justice” and independent referral. Leiden Journal of International Law, 13(3), 655–679.
Hugh Thirlway, Advisory Opinions, Oxford Public International Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (2021–), under the direction of Anne Peters and Rüdiger Wolfrum.
Hutaruk, M. (1983). Kenallah PBB (Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa). Erlangga.
Integrated Food Security Phase Classification. (2023). Gaza Strip: IPC acute food insecurity, November 2023–February 2024.
International Court of Justice. (1990). Arbitral award of 31 July 1989, provisional measures. ICJ Reports, 64–69.
International Court of Justice. (2020). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar), Provisional Measures. https://www.icj-cij.org
International Court of Justice. (2023). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), Press Release No. 2023/77. https://www.icj-cij.org
International Court of Justice. (2024). Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (South Africa v. Israel), Provisional Measures Order. https://www.icj-cij.org
Kolb, R. (2009). The compromissory clause of the convention. In P. Gaeta (Ed.), The UN genocide convention (pp. 407–424). Oxford University Press.
Liivoja, R. (2008). The scope of the supremacy clause of the United Nations Charter. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(3), 583–612.
Lu, B. (2004). Reform of the International Court of Justice—A jurisdictional perspective. Perspectives, 5(2), 1–15.
Manna’, A. (2013). The Palestinian Nakba and its continuous repercussions. Israel Studies, 18(2), 86–99.
Pellet, A. (2003). The Charter of the United Nations: A commentary of Bruno Simma’s commentary. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25(1), 1–28.
Rain Liivoja, The Scope of the Supremacy Clause of the United Nations Charter, 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 583, 612 (2008); see also Wood & Sthoeger, supra note 14, at 9–10.
Reuters. (2023, October 11). A brief history of Gaza’s 75 years of woe. https://www.reuters.com
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, adopted 17 July 1998, entered into force 1 July 2002.
Sadat, L. (2024). Explainer part II: The Israel–Hamas war and the International Court of Justice. JURIST. https://www.jurist.org
Sarooshi, D. (1997). The legal framework governing United Nations subsidiary organs. British Yearbook of International Law, 67, 413–478.
Secretary-General’s Bulletin, Organization of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, UN Doc. ST/SGB/2000/6 (17 Feb. 2000); see also Dale (1974); Sarooshi (1997).
Setiawan, A. (2025). Assessing the United Nations’ capacity to address genocide allegations in Gaza. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(3).
Sthoeger, E. (2024). Article 103 of the United Nations Charter: Uncharted possibilities? Michigan Journal of International Law, 45(2), 153–196.
Thirlway, H. (2021). Advisory opinions. Oxford Public International Law. https://opil.ouplaw.com
Trahan, J. (2020). Existing legal limits to Security Council veto power in the face of atrocity crimes. Cambridge University Press.
United Nations. (1993). Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. https://www.ohchr.org
United Nations. (2000). Secretary-General’s Bulletin: Organization of UNRWA (UN Doc. ST/SGB/2000/6).
United Nations. (2023). Secretary-General’s opening remarks on the situation in Gaza. https://www.un.org
United Nations General Assembly. (2008). Resolution 63/93: Operations of UNRWA.
United Nations General Assembly, Eightieth Session, 53rd & 54th Meetings (AM & PM), General Assembly Adopts Texts Demanding Israeli Withdrawal from Occupied Territories, UN Doc. GA/12737 (2 December 2025).
United Nations Security Council. (1992). Resolution 781 (1992).
United Nations Security Council. (2024). Resolution 2728 (2024).
United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East. (2009). Programme budget 2008–2009 (UN Doc. A/62/13/Add.1).
United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East. (2024). Situation report #59. https://www.unrwa.org
United Nations. (n.d.). Main bodies. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/main-bodies
United Nations. (n.d.). UNISPAL history. https://www.un.org/unispal/history/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ribka Levina Wibisono, Nelsen Wibisono Sutikno, Gita Venolita Valentina Gea
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
